 
 
 
 
 
   
 of conductor
 of conductor 
 defined by the equation
 
defined by the equation
       
 
 ,
but they find that
,
but they find that 
![$ \Vis_{J_0(5389)}({\mbox{{\fontencoding{OT2}\fontfamily{wncyr}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{n}\selectfont Sh}}}(E)[3])=\{0\}$](img246.png) .
We will now verify, without assuming any conjectures, 
that
.
We will now verify, without assuming any conjectures, 
that 
 and 
that these
 and 
that these  elements of
 elements of 
 are visible in
are visible in 
 .
.
First note that the mod  representation
 representation
 attached to
 attached to  is irreducible because
 is irreducible because  is semistable and admits no
 
is semistable and admits no  -isogeny (according
to [Cre]).
The newform attached to
-isogeny (according
to [Cre]).
The newform attached to  is
 is
 
 
 , 
so Ribet's level-raising theorem [Rib90] 
implies that there is a newform
, 
so Ribet's level-raising theorem [Rib90] 
implies that there is a newform  of 
level
 of 
level 
 that is congruent modulo
 that is congruent modulo  to
 to  .
This observation led us to the following proposition.
.
This observation led us to the following proposition.
 to
 to 
 by the sum of the two maps
on Jacobians induced by the two degeneracy maps
 by the sum of the two maps
on Jacobians induced by the two degeneracy maps
 .
The image
.
The image  of
 of  in
 in 
 is
 is 
 -isogenous to
-isogenous to  and
 and
 
 
 is a group of
 is a group of  -power order, so
-power order, so  is isogenous to
 is isogenous to  via
an isogeny of degree a power of
 via
an isogeny of degree a power of  .
.
Consider the elliptic curve  defined by
 defined by 
 .
Using Cremona's programs tate and mwrank we find that
.
Using Cremona's programs tate and mwrank we find that  has conductor
 
has conductor 
 , and that
, and that 
 .
The Tamagawa numbers of
.
The Tamagawa numbers of  at
 at  ,
,  , and
, and  are
 are
 ,
,  , and
, and  , respectively.
The newform attached to
, respectively.
The newform attached to  is
 is
 
 by
checking this congruence for the first
 by
checking this congruence for the first
![$ 7632=[\SL_2(\mathbf{Z}):\Gamma_0(7\cdot 5389)]/6$](img269.png) terms.
Since
 terms.
Since 
 and
 and 
 , the first part of
the multiplicity one theorem of [Edi92, §9]
implies that
, the first part of
the multiplicity one theorem of [Edi92, §9]
implies that 
![$ F[3] = E'[3]$](img272.png) .
.
Finally, we apply Theorem 3.1 with  ,
,  ,
,
 ,
, 
 , and
, and  .  It
is routine to check the hypothesis.  For example,
the hypothesis that
.  It
is routine to check the hypothesis.  For example,
the hypothesis that  has no
 has no 
 -rational
-rational  -torsion
can be checked as follows. 
Cremona's online tables imply that
-torsion
can be checked as follows. 
Cremona's online tables imply that  admits no
 admits no  -isogeny,
so
-isogeny,
so ![$ E[3]$](img278.png) is irreducible.  Since
 is irreducible.  Since  is isogenous to
 is isogenous to  ,
the representation
,
the representation ![$ (J/B)[3]$](img279.png) is also irreducible, so
 is also irreducible, so 
![$ (J/B)(\mathbf{Q})[3]=\{0\}$](img280.png) .
Thus, by Theorem 3.1, we have
.
Thus, by Theorem 3.1, we have
  
 To finish the proof, note that
To finish the proof, note that
 
  
 is
 is  -isogenous to
-isogenous to  and
 and 
 , it
follows that
, it
follows that 
 , as predicted by the 
BSD conjecture.
, as predicted by the 
BSD conjecture.
 
 
 
 
