 
 
 
 
 
   
 is even.
is even.  
Let m be a positive integer, S be a finite set, and T be a 
multiset whose elements are subsets of S, each having a multiplicity 
less than m.  We say that T is a mod-m parity 
multistructure for S if, for each subset b of S, the number m 
divides 
 ,
where, in this intersection, 
each subset of b is counted as many times as it occurs in T.  
If T actually is a set (that is, has all multiplicities at most 1), 
then we say that it is a mod-m parity structure.
,
where, in this intersection, 
each subset of b is counted as many times as it occurs in T.  
If T actually is a set (that is, has all multiplicities at most 1), 
then we say that it is a mod-m parity structure.  
In order to understand mod-m parity multistructures, we use the ring 
![\begin{displaymath}R_{S,m}
:= \frac{{\bf Z}/m{\bf Z}[x_{s}\, :\, s \in S]}{(x_{s}^{2}- x_{s}\, :
\, s \in S)}.
\end{displaymath}](img47.gif) 
 from the collection of multisets of subsets 
of S to RS,m just as before, by sending a subset a of S 
to
from the collection of multisets of subsets 
of S to RS,m just as before, by sending a subset a of S 
to 
 and extending linearly.  
In this ring RS,m we define
and extending linearly.  
In this ring RS,m we define  to be
to be 
 .
Notice that both of 
these definitions agree with our earlier ones in the case where m 
is 2.  As in the proof of Theorem 1, we can show 
that the images under
.
Notice that both of 
these definitions agree with our earlier ones in the case where m 
is 2.  As in the proof of Theorem 1, we can show 
that the images under  of mod-m parity multistructures form 
the ideal
of mod-m parity multistructures form 
the ideal 
 .
If S has size n, then, 
as in Corollary 1, there will be a total 
of
.
If S has size n, then, 
as in Corollary 1, there will be a total 
of 
 mod-m parity multistructures.  However, as we lack the automorphism 
of RS interchanging the ideals corresponding to I and J from 
the proof of Theorem 1, we do not obtain a 
formula as simple as the one from that theorem.
mod-m parity multistructures.  However, as we lack the automorphism 
of RS interchanging the ideals corresponding to I and J from 
the proof of Theorem 1, we do not obtain a 
formula as simple as the one from that theorem.  
We can also generalize Theorem 2 and Corollary 2. Again, the proofs are similar to the ones we have for parity structures, but for the second, there is a bit of calculation with binomial coefficients.
For a collection T of subsets of a finite set S and a sequence of 
natural numbers 
 ,
write
,
write 
 for the number of elements 
of T having size equal to ai for some value of i.
for the number of elements 
of T having size equal to ai for some value of i.  
 .
.
 ,
where (m,k) is the greatest common divisor of m and k.
,
where (m,k) is the greatest common divisor of m and k.  
It is harder, on the other hand, to understand mod-m parity structures. We know of two basic families: For any subset c of S of size congruent to 1 modulo m, the collection of subsets of S obtained by adding m-1 new elements to c forms a mod-m parity structure. And for any subset c of S of size congruent to 2 modulo m, the collection of subsets of S obtained by adding either m-2 or m-1 new elements to c forms a mod-m parity structure. Of course, any disjoint unions of collections of the above types will also be mod-m parity structures, but for m greater than 2, these are the only examples we know. It would be nice to know whether there are more, and we pose the following open problem:
 
 
 
 
