 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 be an abelian variety over an arbitrary field
 be an abelian variety over an arbitrary field  .
.  
 be an embedding of
be an embedding of  into an abelian variety
 into an abelian variety  over
 over  .
Then the visible subgroup of
.
Then the visible subgroup of  with respect 
to the embedding
 with respect 
to the embedding  is
 is
        
 
 depends on the choice of
embedding
 depends on the choice of
embedding  , but we do not include
, but we do not include  in the notation, as
it is usually clear from context.
 in the notation, as
it is usually clear from context.
The Galois cohomology group  has a geometric interpretation
as the group of classes of torsors
 has a geometric interpretation
as the group of classes of torsors  for
 for  (see [LT58]).
To a cohomology class
 (see [LT58]).
To a cohomology class 
 , there is a corresponding
variety
, there is a corresponding
variety  over
 over  and a map
 and a map 
 that satisfies axioms
similar to those for a simply transitive group action.  The set of
equivalence classes of such
 that satisfies axioms
similar to those for a simply transitive group action.  The set of
equivalence classes of such  forms a group, the Weil-Chatelet group
of
 forms a group, the Weil-Chatelet group
of  , which is canonically isomorphic to
, which is canonically isomorphic to  .
.
There is a close relationship between visibility and the geometric
interpretation of Galois cohomology.  Suppose 
 is an
embedding and
 is an
embedding and 
 .  We have an exact sequence of
abelian varieties
.  We have an exact sequence of
abelian varieties 
 , where
, where  .  A piece of
the associated long exact sequence of Galois cohomology is
.  A piece of
the associated long exact sequence of Galois cohomology is
 
 that maps to
 that maps to  .  The fiber
.  The fiber  over
over  is a subvariety of
 is a subvariety of  , which, when equipped with its natural
action of
, which, when equipped with its natural
action of  , lies in the class of torsors corresponding to
, lies in the class of torsors corresponding to  .
This is the origin of the terminology ``visible''.  Also, we remark
that when
.
This is the origin of the terminology ``visible''.  Also, we remark
that when  is a number field,
 is a number field, 
 is finite 
because it is torsion 
and is the surjective image of the finitely generated group
 is finite 
because it is torsion 
and is the surjective image of the finitely generated group  .
.
 
 
 
 
