next up previous
Next: Computing Component Groups Up: Optimal Quotients of Previous: Newforms and Optimal Quotients

Tamagawa Numbers

Let $ \Frob_p:X_J\rightarrow X_J$ denote the map induced by the Frobenius automorphism. We have $ \Frob_p=-W_p$, where $ W_p$ is the map induced by the Atkin-Lehner involution on $ J_0(p)$. Let $ f$ be a newform, $ A=A_f$ the corresponding optimal quotient, and $ w_p$ the sign of the eigenvalue of $ W_p$ on $ f$.

Proposition 7.1  

$\displaystyle \Phi_A(\mathbf{F}_p)
= \begin{cases}
\Phi_A(\overline{\mathbf{F}...
...p=-1$},\\
\Phi_A(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p)[2] & \text{if $w_p=1$.}
\end{cases}$

Proof. If $ w_p=-1$, then $ \Frob_p=1$ and the $ \Gal(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p/\mathbf{F}_p)$-action of $ \Phi_A(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p)$ is trivial. In this case $ \Phi(\mathbf{F}_p)=\Phi(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p)$. Next suppose $ w_p=1$. Recall that we have an exact sequence

$\displaystyle 0\rightarrow X_{A^{\vee}} \rightarrow \Hom(X_A,\mathbf{Z}) \rightarrow \Phi_A \rightarrow 0.$

Since $ W_p$ acts as $ +1$ on $ f$, it also acts as $ +1$ on each of the modules $ A$$ X_A$ $ \Hom(X_A,\mathbf{Z})$, and $ \Phi_A$. Thus $ \Frob_p=-W_p$ acts as $ -1$ on $ \Phi_A$. Since the subgroup of $ 2$-torsion elements of a finite abelian group equals the subgroup of elements fixed under $ -1$, it follows that $ \Phi_A(\mathbf{F}_p) = \Phi_A(\overline{\mathbf{F}}_p)[2]$. $ \qedsymbol$

Warning: When extending this result to the whole of $ J_0(N)$, be careful. The action of $ \Frob_p=T_p$ need not be by $ \pm 1$, even though it must be by an involution of order $ 2$. For example, the component group of $ J_0(65)$ at $ 5$ is cyclic of order $ 42$. The action of $ \Frob_5$ is by multiplication by $ -13$. Note that $ (-13)^2 = 1 \pmod{42}$. The fixed points of multiplication by $ -13$ is the order $ 14$ subgroup of $ \mathbf{Z}/42\mathbf{Z}$.


next up previous
Next: Computing Component Groups Up: Optimal Quotients of Previous: Newforms and Optimal Quotients
William A Stein 2001-12-09