We start by giving several results regarding the Manin constant for quotients of arbitrary dimension. The proofs of most of the theorems are given in Section 4.
Let  be a subgroup of
 be a subgroup of 
 that contains
 that contains
 . 
We have the following generalization of Edixhoven's Theorem 2.2.
. 
We have the following generalization of Edixhoven's Theorem 2.2.
 and
 and  .  Suppose
.  Suppose  is an optimal quotient
of
 is an optimal quotient
of  . We have natural maps
. We have natural maps
 ;
from the proof of Lemma 6.1.6 of [CES03], the image of the composite
is contained in
;
from the proof of Lemma 6.1.6 of [CES03], the image of the composite
is contained in 
 .
The maps
.
The maps 
 induce a chain of inclusions
 induce a chain of inclusions
![% latex2html id marker 7948
$\displaystyle \H ^0(A_{{\bf {Z}}},\Omega^1_{A/{\bf...
...}}) \hookrightarrow S_2(\Gamma_1(N);{\bf {Z}}) \hookrightarrow {\bf {Z}}[[q]].
$](img136.png) 
Combining this chain of inclusions with commutativity of the diagram
![$\displaystyle \xymatrix{
& {S_2(\Gamma_1(N))}\ar[dr]^{\text{$F$-exp}}\\
{S_2(\Gamma)} \ar[ur]^{f(q)\mapsto f(q)}\ar[rr]^{\text{$F$-exp}}
& & {{\bf{C}}[[q]]},
}
$](img137.png) 
where
 -exp is the Fourier expansion map,
we see that the image of
-exp is the Fourier expansion map,
we see that the image of 
 lies in
lies in 
![$ S_2({\bf {Z}})[I]$](img119.png) , as claimed.
, as claimed.
  
For the rest of the paper, we take 
 .
For each prime
.
For each prime 
 with
 with 
 , let
, let  be
the
 be
the  th Atkin-Lehner operator.  Let
th Atkin-Lehner operator.  Let  and
 and 
 be an optimal quotient of
be an optimal quotient of  attached to a saturated ideal
 attached to a saturated ideal  .
If
.
If  is a prime, then as usual,
 is a prime, then as usual, 
 will denote the
localization of
 will denote the
localization of  at
 at  .
.
 is an odd prime such that
 is an odd prime such that 
 ,
and that if
,
and that if 
 , then
, then 
 is stable under
 is stable under  .
Then
.
Then 
 if and only if
 if and only if 
 and
 and
![$ S_2({{\bf {Z}}_{(\ell)}})[I]$](img150.png) is not stable under the action
of
 is not stable under the action
of  .
.
![$ S_2({{\bf {Z}}_{(\ell)}})[I]$](img150.png) is stable under
 is stable under 
 can be verified using standard algorithms.  Thus
in light of Theorem 3.5, if
 can be verified using standard algorithms.  Thus
in light of Theorem 3.5, if  is stable under
all Atkin-Lehner operators and
 is stable under
all Atkin-Lehner operators and  is square free, then
one can compute  the set of odd primes that divide
 is square free, then
one can compute  the set of odd primes that divide  .
It would be interesting to refine the arguments of this
paper to find an algorithm to compute
.
It would be interesting to refine the arguments of this
paper to find an algorithm to compute  exactly.
 exactly.
Let 
 denote the abelian subvariety of
 denote the abelian subvariety of  generated by
the images of the degeneracy maps from levels that properly divide
 generated by
the images of the degeneracy maps from levels that properly divide  (see, e.g., [Maz78, §2(b)]) and let
(see, e.g., [Maz78, §2(b)]) and let 
 denote the
quotient of
 denote the
quotient of  by
 by 
 . 
A new quotient is a quotient
. 
A new quotient is a quotient  that factors through the map
that factors through the map 
 .
The following corollary generalizes Mazur's Theorem 2.3:
.
The following corollary generalizes Mazur's Theorem 2.3:
 is a newform,
 is a newform,  acts as either
 acts as either
 or
 or  on
 on  hence on
 hence on 
![$ S_2({{\bf {Z}}_{(\ell)}})[I]$](img150.png) .
Thus
.
Thus 
![$ S_2({{\bf {Z}}_{(\ell)}})[I]$](img150.png) is
 is  -stable.
-stable.
  
 is the new subvariety of
 is the new subvariety of  and
and 
 is a prime, then
 is a prime, then  or
 or 
 .
(In particular, if
.
(In particular, if  is prime then the Manin
constant of
 is prime then the Manin
constant of  is a power of
 is a power of  , since
, since 
![$ A=J_0(N)[I]$](img161.png) for
 for  .)
.)
 , then
, then
 
with respect to the basis
|  |  | |
|  |  | |
|  |  | 
 .   Thus
.   Thus  does not preserve
 does not preserve 
 . 
In fact, the Manin constant of
. 
In fact, the Manin constant of  is not
 is not  in this case (see Section 3.4). 
Note that
Theorem 3.5 implies that the only primes that
can divide the Manin constant of any optimal quotient of tex2html_wrap_inline$J_0(33)$are tex2html_wrap_inline$2$ and tex2html_wrap_inline$3$.
 
in this case (see Section 3.4). 
Note that
Theorem 3.5 implies that the only primes that
can divide the Manin constant of any optimal quotient of tex2html_wrap_inline$J_0(33)$are tex2html_wrap_inline$2$ and tex2html_wrap_inline$3$.
The hypothesis of Theorem 3.5 sometimes holds for non-new
 .  For example, take
.  For example, take 
 and
 and  .  Then
.  Then  acts
as an endomorphism of
 acts
as an endomorphism of  , and a computation shows that the
characteristic polynomial of
, and a computation shows that the
characteristic polynomial of  on
 on 
 is
 is  and on
 
and on 
 is
 is 
 , where
, where 
 is the old subspace of
is the old subspace of  .
Consider the optimal elliptic curve
quotient
.
Consider the optimal elliptic curve
quotient 
 , which is isogenous to
, which is isogenous to  .  Then
.  Then  is an optimal old quotient of
is an optimal old quotient of  , and
, and  acts as
 acts as  on
 on  ,
so
,
so  preserves the corresponding spaces of modular forms. Thus
Theorem 3.5 implies that
 preserves the corresponding spaces of modular forms. Thus
Theorem 3.5 implies that 
 .
.
The following theorem generalizes Raynaud's
Theorem 2.4 (see also [GL01] for
generalizations to  -curves).
-curves). 
Note that in light of Theorem 3.5, this theorem gives new information only at
 , when
, when 
 . 
We prove the theorem in Section 4.4
. 
We prove the theorem in Section 4.4
Let tex2html_wrap_inline$S_2(Z)[I]^&perp#perp;$ be the orthogonal complement of
tex2html_wrap_inline$S_2(Z)[I]$ in tex2html_wrap_inline$S_2(Z)$ with respect to the Petersson inner
product. 
theorem_type[defi][lem][][definition][][]
[Congruence exponent and number]
The  congruence number tex2html_wrap_inline$r_A$ of tex2html_wrap_inline$A$is the order of the quotient group
equation   S_2(Z)/ (S_2(Z)[I] + S_2(Z)[I]^&perp#perp;).
This definition of tex2html_wrap_inline$r_A$ agrees with Definition ![[*]](/usr/share/latex2html/icons/crossref.png) when tex2html_wrap_inline$A$ is an elliptic curve (see
[AU96, p. 276]).
when tex2html_wrap_inline$A$ is an elliptic curve (see
[AU96, p. 276]).
Let  denote the natural quotient map
 denote the natural quotient map 
 .
When we compose
.
When we compose  with its dual
 with its dual 
 (identifying
(identifying  with
 with  using
the inverse of the principal polarization of
 using
the inverse of the principal polarization of  ), 
we get an isogeny
), 
we get an isogeny 
 .
The  modular exponent
.
The  modular exponent 
 of
 of  is the exponent of the group
is the exponent of the group 
 .
When
.
When  is an elliptic curve, the modular exponent is just
the modular degree of
 is an elliptic curve, the modular exponent is just
the modular degree of  (see, e.g., [AU96, p. 278]).
 (see, e.g., [AU96, p. 278]).
Again, in view of Corollary 3.7, this theorem gives new information only at
 , when
, when 
 .
We prove the theorem in Section 4.3.
.
We prove the theorem in Section 4.3.
The theorems above
suggest
that the Manin constant is  for quotients associated to newforms
of square-free level.
In the case when the level is not square free, computations of
[FpS+01] involving Jacobians of genus
 for quotients associated to newforms
of square-free level.
In the case when the level is not square free, computations of
[FpS+01] involving Jacobians of genus  curves that are 
quotients of
 curves that are 
quotients of 
 show that
 show that
 for
 for  two-dimensional newform quotients. 
These include quotients having the following 
non-square-free levels:
 two-dimensional newform quotients. 
These include quotients having the following 
non-square-free levels:
 
The above observations suggest the following conjecture, which generalizes Conjecture 2.1:
It is plausible that 
 for any newform on any congruence
subgroup between
 for any newform on any congruence
subgroup between 
 and
 and 
 .  However, we do not have
enough data to justify making a conjecture in this context.
.  However, we do not have
enough data to justify making a conjecture in this context.
William Stein 2006-06-25