 is an object of central importance
in number theory, and I've often heard that in some sense number
theory is the study of this group.  A good way to study a group is to
study how it acts on various objects, that is, to study its
representations.
 is an object of central importance
in number theory, and I've often heard that in some sense number
theory is the study of this group.  A good way to study a group is to
study how it acts on various objects, that is, to study its
representations.
Endow 
 with the topology which has as a basis of open neighborhoods
of the origin the subgroups
 with the topology which has as a basis of open neighborhoods
of the origin the subgroups 
 , where
, where  varies
over finite Galois extensions of
 varies
over finite Galois extensions of 
 . (Note: This is not the
topology got by taking as a basis of open neighborhoods the collection
of finite-index normal subgroups of
. (Note: This is not the
topology got by taking as a basis of open neighborhoods the collection
of finite-index normal subgroups of 
 .)
Fix a positive integer
.)
Fix a positive integer  and let
 and let 
 be the group of
 be the group of
 invertible matrices over
 invertible matrices over 
 with the discrete topology.
 with the discrete topology.
For
 to be continuous means that there is a finite Galois
extension
 to be continuous means that there is a finite Galois
extension 
 such that
 such that  factors through
 factors through 
 :
:
![$\displaystyle \xymatrix{ {{\mathrm{Gal}}(\overline{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})}\ar[...
...{\rho}\ar[dr]& &{\GL _n(\mathbf{C})}\\
&{\Gal (K/\mathbf{Q})}\ar[ur]_{\rho'}}
$](img1388.png) 
 to be
the fixed field of
 to be
the fixed field of 
 .  (Note that continous implies that
the image of
.  (Note that continous implies that
the image of  is finite, but using Zorn's lemma one can show
that there are homomorphisms
 is finite, but using Zorn's lemma one can show
that there are homomorphisms 
 with finite image
that are not continuous, since they do not factor through the Galois
group of any finite Galois extension.)
 with finite image
that are not continuous, since they do not factor through the Galois
group of any finite Galois extension.)
Fix a Galois representation  and a finite Galois extension
 and a finite Galois extension
 such that
 such that  factors through
 factors through 
 .
For each prime
.
For each prime 
 that is not ramified in
 that is not ramified in  , there is an
element
, there is an
element 
 that is well-defined up to conjugation
by elements of
 that is well-defined up to conjugation
by elements of 
 .  This means that
.  This means that 
 is well-defined up to conjugation.  Thus the characteristic polynomial
is well-defined up to conjugation.  Thus the characteristic polynomial
![$ F_p\in\mathbf{C}[x]$](img1393.png) is a well-defined invariant of
 is a well-defined invariant of  and
 and  .  Let
.  Let
 
 .  
Following E. Artin, set
.  
Following E. Artin, set
 as a function of a single complex variable
 as a function of a single complex variable  .
One can prove that
.
One can prove that  is holomorphic on some right
half plane, and extends to a meromorphic function on all
 is holomorphic on some right
half plane, and extends to a meromorphic function on all 
 .
.
 -series of any continuous representation
-series of any continuous representation 
 
 , except possibly at
, except possibly at  .
. to the whole complex plane, except possibly at
 to the whole complex plane, except possibly at  .  
(A standard fact from complex analysis is that this analytic
continuation must be unique.)
The simple pole at
.  
(A standard fact from complex analysis is that this analytic
continuation must be unique.)
The simple pole at  corresponds to the trivial representation (the
Riemann zeta function), and if
 corresponds to the trivial representation (the
Riemann zeta function), and if  and
 and  is irreducible,
then the conjecture is that
 is irreducible,
then the conjecture is that  extends to a holomorphic function
on all
 extends to a holomorphic function
on all 
 .
.
The conjecture follows from class field theory for 
 when
 when
 . When
. When  and the image of
 and the image of  in
 in 
 is a
solvable group, the conjecture is known, and is a deep theorem of
Langlands and others (see [Lan80]), which played
a crucial roll in Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.  When
 is a
solvable group, the conjecture is known, and is a deep theorem of
Langlands and others (see [Lan80]), which played
a crucial roll in Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.  When  and the projective image is not solvable, the only possibility is that
the projective image is isomorphic to the alternating group
and the projective image is not solvable, the only possibility is that
the projective image is isomorphic to the alternating group  .
Because
.
Because  is the symmetric group of the icosahedron, these
representations are called .  In this case, Joe
Buhler's Harvard Ph.D. thesis gave the first example, there is a whole
book  [Fre94],
which proves Artin's conjecture for 7 icosahedral representation (none
of which are twists of each other).  Kevin Buzzard and I (Stein)
proved the conjecture for 8 more examples.  Subsequently, Richard
Taylor, Kevin Buzzard, and Mark Dickinson proved the conjecture for an
infinite class of icosahedral Galois representations (disjoint from
the examples).  The general problem for
 is the symmetric group of the icosahedron, these
representations are called .  In this case, Joe
Buhler's Harvard Ph.D. thesis gave the first example, there is a whole
book  [Fre94],
which proves Artin's conjecture for 7 icosahedral representation (none
of which are twists of each other).  Kevin Buzzard and I (Stein)
proved the conjecture for 8 more examples.  Subsequently, Richard
Taylor, Kevin Buzzard, and Mark Dickinson proved the conjecture for an
infinite class of icosahedral Galois representations (disjoint from
the examples).  The general problem for  is still open, but
perhaps Taylor and others are still making progress toward it.
 is still open, but
perhaps Taylor and others are still making progress toward it.
William Stein 2004-05-06