 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Here are some problems, both computational and theoretical, about
computing with cohomology of arithmetic groups in 
 -rank
-rank  .
Many of these are discussed in more detail in the appendix to the
book [Ste07].  I thank Avner Ash for suggesting problems (2)
and (3), and for many helpful discussions.
.
Many of these are discussed in more detail in the appendix to the
book [Ste07].  I thank Avner Ash for suggesting problems (2)
and (3), and for many helpful discussions.
 , where
, where 
 is a
  congruence subgroup of
 is a
  congruence subgroup of 
 , and
, and  is the symmetric space
 is the symmetric space
  
 .  In particular your program should be able to
  compute a basis for the cohomology space and compute the action of
  the Hecke operators. One public version of such a program exists on
  the net at the homepage of Wilberd van der Kallen, but it's in
  Pascal and isn't maintained.  Nevertheless it might be a good
  starting point.
.  In particular your program should be able to
  compute a basis for the cohomology space and compute the action of
  the Hecke operators. One public version of such a program exists on
  the net at the homepage of Wilberd van der Kallen, but it's in
  Pascal and isn't maintained.  Nevertheless it might be a good
  starting point.
 and let
 and let 
 be a congruence subgroup.  Investigate the cohomology of the boundary
of the Borel-Serre compactification of
be a congruence subgroup.  Investigate the cohomology of the boundary
of the Borel-Serre compactification of 
 with
coefficients
 with
coefficients 
 or
 or 
 .
.
 of the boundary.
 of the boundary.
 s.
s.  
 of generalized modular symbols for
congruence subgroups of
 of generalized modular symbols for
congruence subgroups of 
 (cf. [Ste07, A.6.8]) in a variety of ways:
(cf. [Ste07, A.6.8]) in a variety of ways:
 modular symbols using your model.
 modular symbols using your model.
 for
 for  .
.
 .  Investigate
generalized modular symbols computationally on subgroups of
.  Investigate
generalized modular symbols computationally on subgroups of 
 , perhaps using the retract of MacPherson-McConnell [MM93],
cf. [Ste07, A.6.4].
, perhaps using the retract of MacPherson-McConnell [MM93],
cf. [Ste07, A.6.4].
 (at least for
 (at least for  ), to
deeper cohomology groups.  Run tests similar to those in
[Gun00] to tweak and polish your algorithm.
), to
deeper cohomology groups.  Run tests similar to those in
[Gun00] to tweak and polish your algorithm. 
 of subgroups of
 of subgroups of 
 with
 with 
 coefficients.  By work of Ash [Ash92], such cohomology classes are
connected to abelian Galois representations.  Another check is
coefficients.  By work of Ash [Ash92], such cohomology classes are
connected to abelian Galois representations.  Another check is  of subgroups of
of subgroups of 
 .  The results there could be compared to
[AGM02].  For new results, you could apply your algorithm
to
.  The results there could be compared to
[AGM02].  For new results, you could apply your algorithm
to  of subgroups of
 of subgroups of 
 .
.
 (real) dimensional deformation retracts of Hilbert modular varieties
that can be used to compute cohomology?
(real) dimensional deformation retracts of Hilbert modular varieties
that can be used to compute cohomology?  
 [MM93,MM89].  Use the retract to compute cohomology of subgroups
of
 [MM93,MM89].  Use the retract to compute cohomology of subgroups
of 
 with various coefficients.
 with various coefficients.
 's characterization for
the
's characterization for
the 
 retract?
 retract?
 ?
?
 
 
 
 
 
 
