 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 is an optimal quotient of
 is an optimal quotient of 
 the modular degree of
 the modular degree of
 is the degree of the composite map
 is the degree of the composite map
 
where we may identify
 with
 with  since
 since  is a Jacobian
of a curve with a rational point.
 is a Jacobian
of a curve with a rational point. 
The period lattice  for
 for  can be described in terms of a
pair of matrices
 can be described in terms of a
pair of matrices 
 such that
 such that 
 .  The volume of this lattice is one
of the invariants which enters into the BSD Conjectures.
.  The volume of this lattice is one
of the invariants which enters into the BSD Conjectures. 
An analytic approach is the only known general way to compute the
modular degree of an optimal quotient  of
 of  .  More
precisely, there is a purely algebraic algorithm (which involves the
theory of the analytic period lattice), which allows one to compute
the modular degree.  See [KS00] and the MAGMA
source code.  When
.  More
precisely, there is a purely algebraic algorithm (which involves the
theory of the analytic period lattice), which allows one to compute
the modular degree.  See [KS00] and the MAGMA
source code.  When  has dimension
 has dimension  there is an alternate
algorithm due to Mark Watkins to compute the modular degree.  It
involves making computation of
 there is an alternate
algorithm due to Mark Watkins to compute the modular degree.  It
involves making computation of 
 explicit and using Flach's
theorem.
 explicit and using Flach's
theorem. 
"Flach's Theorem" should be (maybe) "Shimura's formula"
or something. Flach's theorem relates 
 to the
Bloch-Kato conjecture, whereas the Shimura work relates it
(via Rankin convolution) to the modular degree (at least for
curves that are not semistable, getting the fudge factors correct
probably is mentioned first in Flach, but he doesn't exactly
work out the factors explicitly).
 to the
Bloch-Kato conjecture, whereas the Shimura work relates it
(via Rankin convolution) to the modular degree (at least for
curves that are not semistable, getting the fudge factors correct
probably is mentioned first in Flach, but he doesn't exactly
work out the factors explicitly).
However, I think the best reference for the passage from  to the modular degree is in Flach's paper:
to the modular degree is in Flach's paper:
[ ] [10] MR1300880 (95h:11053) Flach, Matthias On the degree of modular parametrizations. Seminaire de Theorie des Nombres, Paris, 1991--92, 23--36, Progr. Math., 116, Birkhaeuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1993. (Reviewer: Henri Darmon) 11G05 (11F30 11F33 11G40)
 ?
?
 -curves of
  Problem 8.5.3, but nothing ever happened with
  it.
-curves of
  Problem 8.5.3, but nothing ever happened with
  it.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
