 and
 and  are continuous functions on an
interval
 are continuous functions on an
interval ![$ [a,b]$](img17.png) and
 and 
 , then
, then
 
Not only does this technique help in determing whether integrals converge, but it also gives you some information about their values, which is often much easier to obtain than computing the exact integral.
 and
 and  be continuous functions with
 be continuous functions with 
 for
 
for  .
.  
 converges, then
 converges, then
 converges.
 converges.
 diverges then
 diverges then 
 diverges.
 diverges.
 for all
 for all  , the function
, the function
 
 converges to some value
 converges to some value  , then 
for any
, then 
for any  we have
 we have
 
 is a non-decreasing function bounded
above, hence the limit
 is a non-decreasing function bounded
above, hence the limit 
 exists. 
This proves the first statement.
 exists. 
This proves the first statement. 
Likewise, the function
 
 diverges then
the function
 diverges then
the function
 defined above is still non-decreasing and
 defined above is still non-decreasing and
 does not exist, so
 does not exist, so  is not bounded.   Since
is not bounded.   Since 
 we
have
 we
have 
 for all
 for all  , hence
, hence
 is also unbounded, which proves the second statement.
 is also unbounded, which proves the second statement.
  
 converge? Answer: YES.
 converge? Answer: YES.
Since 
 , we really do have
, we really do have
 
 
 converges.
 converges. 
But why did we use 
 ?  It's a guess that turned out
to work.  You could have used something else, e.g.,
?  It's a guess that turned out
to work.  You could have used something else, e.g., 
 for
some constant
 for
some constant  .  This is an illustration of how in mathematics
sometimes you have to use your imagination or guess and see what
happens.  Don't get anxious--instead, relax, take a deep breath and
explore.
.  This is an illustration of how in mathematics
sometimes you have to use your imagination or guess and see what
happens.  Don't get anxious--instead, relax, take a deep breath and
explore.
For example, alternatively we could have done the following:
 
 converges (as
 converges (as 
 is continuous).
 
is continuous).
 .  Does it converge
or diverge?
For large values of
.  Does it converge
or diverge?
For large values of  , the term
, the term  very quickly goes to 0,
so we expect this to diverge, since
 very quickly goes to 0,
so we expect this to diverge, since 
 diverges.
For
diverges.
For  , we have
, we have 
 , so
for all
, so
for all  we have
 we have 
 (verify by cross multiplying)
   (verify by cross multiplying) 
![$\displaystyle \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x+1} dx
= \lim_{t\to\infty} [\ln(x+1)]_1^{t}
= \infty
$](img923.png) 
 must also diverge.
 must also diverge. Note that there is a natural analogue of Theorem 5.7.8 for integrals of functions that ``blow up'' at a point, but we will not state it formally.
 
 
 
 converges, even though
we haven't figured out its value.   We just know that it is
 converges, even though
we haven't figured out its value.   We just know that it is  .
(In fact, it is
.
(In fact, it is 
 .)
.)
What if we found a function that is bigger than 
 and its integral diverges??  So what!  This does
nothing for you.  Bzzzt. Try again.
 and its integral diverges??  So what!  This does
nothing for you.  Bzzzt. Try again.
 
 has a pole at
 has a pole at  .
Does it converge?  NO.
.
Does it converge?  NO.
![$ [0,1]$](img933.png) we have
 we have 
 .
Thus
.
Thus 
|  |  | |
|  | ||
|  | 
 diverges.
 diverges.William Stein 2006-03-15