 
 if $a&ne#neq;-1$
   if $a&ne#neq;-1$ 
Just as with the power rule, many other rules and results that you already know yield techniques for integration. In general integration is potentially much trickier than differentiation, because it is often not obvious which technique to use, or even how to use it. Integration is a more exciting than differentiation!
Recall the chain rule, which asserts that
 
 , we have
, we have
 
 is a function that is differentiable
and whose range is an interval on which
 is a function that is differentiable
and whose range is an interval on which  is continuous.
 is continuous. is continuous on the range of
 is continuous on the range of  ,
  Theorem 2.1.5 (the fundamental theorem of Calculus)
  implies that there is a function
,
  Theorem 2.1.5 (the fundamental theorem of Calculus)
  implies that there is a function  such that
 such that  .
 Then
.
 Then
|  |  | |
|  | ||
|  | ||
|  | 
 
If  then
 then 
 , and the substitution rule simply
says if you let
, and the substitution rule simply
says if you let  formally in the integral everywhere, what you
naturally would hope to be true based on the notation actually is
true.  The substitution rule illustrates how the notation Leibniz
invented for Calculus is incredibly brilliant.  It is said that
Leibniz would often spend days just trying to find the right notation
for a concept.  He succeeded.
 formally in the integral everywhere, what you
naturally would hope to be true based on the notation actually is
true.  The substitution rule illustrates how the notation Leibniz
invented for Calculus is incredibly brilliant.  It is said that
Leibniz would often spend days just trying to find the right notation
for a concept.  He succeeded.
As with all of Calculus, the best way to start to get your head around a new concept is to see severally clearly worked out examples. (And the best way to actually be able to use the new idea is to do lots of problems yourself!) In this section we present examples that illustrate how to apply the substituion rule to compute indefinite integrals.
 
 . Then
. Then 
 , hence
, hence 
 . Now substitute it all in:
. Now substitute it all in:
 
 
 .  Then
.  Then 
 , and the integral above becomes
, and the integral above becomes
 
 for all
 for all  .
.
 
 .  Then
.  Then  . Noting that
. Noting that  by solving
for
 by solving
for  in
 in  , we see that the above integral becomes
, we see that the above integral becomes
|  |  | |
|  | ||
|  | ||
|  | 
William Stein 2006-03-15